[reading list] Filter Bubbles, Old and New

Stone Foam
Creative Commons License photo credit: Orin Zebest

Been dipping in and out of Eli Parisier’s The Filter Bubble (2011), as part of a longer piece I’m working on. Had some rough thoughts and jottings I wanted throw out into the darkness:

  • ‘Personalized search for everyone’ (Google’s stated mission, for a time)
  • The filter bubble provides ‘a unique universe of information for each of us … which fundamentally alters the way we encounter ideas and information’ (Parisier, 2011: 9)
  • ‘When the technology’s job is to show you the world, it ends up sitting between you and reality, like a camera lens.’ (Parisier, 2011: 13)
Air conditioning as a mark of privilege in India and China providing a sterile environment, freedom from pollutants. Mary Douglas’ seminal work Purity and Danger (1966). Favela clearances, ethnic cleansing, right-wing nationalism. Gated communities. Rhetorics of multiculturalism (‘melting pot’, ‘stir fry’) and contagion. Benedict Andersson’s Imagined Communities (1983), in which he argues that nationalism is basically an accretion of shared in-jokes.
  • Pillarisation (verzuiling) — ‘a term used to describe the politico-denominational segregation of Dutch and Belgian society …  ”vertically” divided into several segments or “pillars” (zuilen) according to different religions or ideologies.’
  • Doorbraak (‘breakthrough’) ‘an attempt to renew the politics of the Netherlands after the Second World War.’

Starting to wonder if the our best chance of filter bubble-busting Doorbraak might have been something like ChatRoulette. Certainly, one of my highlights of 2010 was encouraging my neighbour to play guitar to a baffled Chilean dentistry student.

Simpler times!

TV On The Radio: ‘Will Do’

As a brother-in-arms to that last post, I give you Dugan O’Neal‘s video for ‘Will Do‘, from TV On The Radio’s latest album, ‘Nine Kinds of Light‘:

Design fiction in the service of art rock, and a killer example of cyborg sensoria. Splendid stuff.

Walt Disney’s Tomorrowland

Great video, condensing the ubridled optimism of the 20th century technological imaginary of the then-hegemonic United States into some weird, techno-utopian nugget. These images are our legacy futures; our inheritance and the fetters on our collective imagination.

[future shock] Network Realism

Kindle
Creative Commons License photo credit: cloudsoup

Care of (unwitting?) bookfuturist James Bridle, I give you ‘Network Realism‘. This, ladies and gentlemen, is exactly what I was attempting (with mixed success) to get across in the final chapters of my MA dissertation:

‘Network Realism is writing that is of and about the network. It’s realism because it’s so close to our present reality. A realism that posits an increasingly 1:1 relationship between Fiction and the World. A realtime link. And it’s networked because it lives in a place that’s that’s enabled by, and only recently made possible by, our technological connectedness.

(…)

This writing exists on a timeline, but it’s not a simple line back-to-the-past and forward-to-the-future. It’s a gathering-together of many currently possible worldlines, seen from the near-omniscient superposition of the network. The Order Flow of the Universe. Speculative Realism, Networked Fiction: Network Realism.’

James Bridle, ‘Network Realism: William Gibson and new forms of Fiction‘, 25/10/2010

Here, an admission – networked realism is what I’ll be churning out this autumn. It’s the narrative form of the much-implied secret project; the perfect literary accompaniment for atemporal culture and our shiny new, post-Newtonian network politics.

More details to follow, in glimpses and dribbles.

Steven Johnson: Innovation & Anarchism

Steven Johnson
Creative Commons License photo credit: Phil Hawksworth

There’s a seriously nifty interview with science writer Steven Johnson in today’s Guardian. Not sure how I feel about his occasional echoes of the technology tree from Sid Meier’s Civilization, but the notion of an ‘adjacent possible’ is really rather wonderful. Some choice extracts:

‘to 1950s viewers, Johnson argues, complex TV shows such as Lost or The Wire would have been borderline incomprehensible, like some kind of avant-garde art, because certain ways of engaging with the medium hadn’t yet been learned.’

The co-evolution of technology and cultural form was one of the precepts of my Goldsmiths MA. So the level of personal resonance should be of no great surprise…

‘the best way to encourage (or to have) new ideas isn’t to fetishise the “spark of genius”, to retreat to a mountain cabin in order to “be creative”, or to blabber interminably about “blue-sky”, “out-of-the-box” thinking. Rather, it’s to expand the range of your possible next moves – the perimeter of your potential – by exposing yourself to as much serendipity, as much argument and conversation, as many rival and related ideas as possible; to borrow, to repurpose, to recombine. This is one way of explaining the creativity generated by cities, by Europe’s 17th-century coffee-houses, and by the internet.’

In other words, “maximise your exposure to randomness.”

See also: The real reason for Germany’s industrial expansion.

more »

[future shock] Animated News!

Thus far, 2010 seems to have been dominated by media artifacts of such world-historical contingency and raw peculiarity that – following any kind of close examination – they cause your brain to effervesce all over the floor.

Above, I give you the video equivalent of Iceland; dripping with futurity and latent fubarosity (where ‘fubar‘ = ‘the formal official metric unit of contemporary weirdness’). Let’s break it down.

more »